Syllabus area: Section V: Gender and Development of CSS Gender Studies.
Short answer
The gender critique of Structural Adjustment Policies is an accounting exercise with a fixed result. The programs stabilize economies, open markets and control inflation, and they finance that stability by reducing expenditure, widening indirect taxation, liberalizing trade and privatizing the state, each of which rolls downhill onto the population least able to refuse it.
Outline for quick revision
- What SAPs are
- The stated purposes and the positive impacts (the fair hearing)
- The general negative impacts on Pakistan
- The gender critique proper: how each negative lands on women first
- Conclusion
1. What SAPs Are
Structural Adjustment Programs are the programs of the world financial institutions, the IMF and the World Bank, that Pakistan takes when it borrows. Their stated purpose comes as a package of conditions: liberalize trade, promote competition, reduce expenditure, enhance exports, provide bail-out packages, improve public-private partnership, and control inflation. The gender critique of SAPs asks one question of that package: when a state adjusts its structure to satisfy its lenders, who inside the state absorbs the adjustment? The critique’s answer, developed below, is that the adjustment rolls downhill, from the state to the poor, and within the poor, to women.
2. The Stated Purposes and the Positive Impacts (the Fair Hearing)
- SAPs bring stability to the economy of a country in crisis.
- Trade liberalization lowers tariffs and licensing, opens free-trade agreements, and brings variety and competition to the market.
- Business promotion follows investment: jobs, labor, products, a working market.
- Public-private partnership modernizes state carriers such as railways and airlines.
- Inflation control protects the currency the poor hold.
- The fair hearing matters in a critique, because the gender case against SAPs is not that they do nothing, it is that their costs and benefits are distributed by gender.
3. The General Negative Impacts on Pakistan
- Trade liberalization hurts local industry: a simple price example shows imports cheapening once tariffs fall, buyers switching to imports, and local industry collapsing, a country must protect its local industry.
- Sovereignty is lost: running to the IMF for every decision means the lender dictates, the State Bank answers outward, and interference replaces policy.
- Indirect taxation increases: the tax base is widened to repay loans, and indirect taxes, the taxes the poor cannot escape, rise.
- Privatization slips institutions out of state hands (PIA, buses, railways, WAPDA), and loans are misused, claimed “for women” on paper and pocketed.
- The human-rights tag: those who raise the rights violations that accompany adjustment are labelled “anti-state,” which silences the critique’s messengers.
4. The Gender Critique Proper: How Each Negative Lands on Women First
(a) Expenditure reduction cuts women first
- “Reduce expenditure” means cutting the social spending on which women depend most, and Pakistan’s health spending already stands at roughly one percent of GDP, with women’s health ranked near the bottom of world indices.
- When health budgets shrink, it is maternal mortality, anemia and rural gynecology that shrink last-funded and first-cut, so the fiscal adjustment is paid in women’s bodies.
- When education budgets shrink, the daughter is withdrawn from school before the son, because the household economics that SAPs tighten are already gendered.
(b) Indirect taxation is a tax on the powerless
- Indirect taxes fall on consumption, and the poor consume everything they earn, so the widened tax base lands on poor households, and inside poor households the woman is the shock absorber who eats last and least.
- The critique connects to the pink-tax observation: a tax system that treats sanitary pads as a luxury while widening indirect taxation is adjusting its structure on women’s necessities.
(c) Liberalization and privatization restructure women’s work downward
- When local industry collapses under liberalized imports, the jobs lost include the low-wage manufacturing work that women hold; when state institutions are privatized, the shed workforce is re-hired informally, cheaper and unprotected.
- Women are then absorbed by the informal sector, the sector where their labor is uncounted (worth around two to three trillion dollars globally if counted) and where the ILO’s #1-ranked gender pay gap operates without even a payslip to prove it.
- the capitalistic frame names the arrangement: the man exploits the woman as capital exploits labor, and adjustment globalizes the arrangement, adding the lender above the owner above the man above the woman.
(d) The “for women” loans that never arrive
- Loans justified on paper as being “for women” are pocketed by the structures they pass through, so women carry the debt’s repayment (through indirect taxes and cut services) without receiving the debt’s benefit.
- This is structural violence in fiscal form: invisible, depersonalized, with no clear perpetrator, because no single official denied any single woman; the structure adjusted, and she paid.
(e) The silenced critique
- The human-rights tag completes the gender critique, because the feminists who document these costs are labelled “anti-state”, so the adjustment not only redistributes resources away from women but delegitimizes the women who say so.
5. Conclusion
The gender critique of Structural Adjustment Policies is an accounting exercise with a fixed result. The programs stabilize economies, open markets and control inflation, and they finance that stability by reducing expenditure, widening indirect taxation, liberalizing trade and privatizing the state, each of which rolls downhill onto the population least able to refuse it. That population is female: the woman whose health budget is one percent of GDP, whose necessities are taxed as luxuries, whose job is informalized and uncounted, and in whose name loans are taken that never reach her. The critique in one sentence: structural adjustment adjusts the structure of the state by tightening the structure of the household, and the household’s shock absorber has always been the woman.
More preparation: See all CSS Gender Studies past papers by topic.
Related answers:
- WID, WAD and GAD Approaches: CSS Gender Studies Answer
- Globalization and Gender: CSS Gender Studies Solved Answer
Last updated: 2 November 2026.
Preparing for CSS 2027? Subscribe to Prep With NAJO WAVE for more Gender Studies answers.

